Keiser Doubts New Crypto Holding Firms’ Bitcoin Commitment
Note: This post may contain affiliate links, and we may earn a commission (with No additional cost for you) if you make a purchase via our link. See our disclosure for more info. The crypto world is constantly changing. This content is for informational purposes only and not financial, legal, or professional advice So, please verify the info on the cryptocurrency provider’s websites.
Bitcoin advocate Max Keiser is expressing skepticism about the long-term commitment of newly established Bitcoin treasury companies, questioning whether they possess the same unwavering dedication as MicroStrategy, led by Michael Saylor. Keiser highlights Saylor's steadfast approach, continuously buying Bitcoin even during market downturns and while his holdings were underwater. He contrasts this with the newer firms, which haven't yet faced a significant bear market, suggesting their resolve might waver if Bitcoin prices decline. Keiser's concerns stem from the observation that several companies are rapidly adopting a Bitcoin treasury strategy, mirroring MicroStrategy's success. Dozens of businesses announced similar plans in the first half of 2025, leading some analysts to predict that corporate balance sheets may soon hold over 50% of all crypto. Examples include Strive, an asset management firm, and Trump Media & Technology Group, which secured a $2.5 billion investment for Bitcoin acquisition. This surge in corporate Bitcoin holdings, fueled by MicroStrategy's success, is driving up demand and creating a potentially risky environment. The rapid increase in corporate interest has also led to premium pricing for stocks offering Bitcoin exposure. Metaplanet, for instance, trades at a premium of $600,000 per Bitcoin, significantly higher than buying Bitcoin directly. Analysts warn that these premiums are unsustainable, potentially evaporating if Bitcoin prices drop or investor interest wanes. Keiser's skepticism underscores the inherent risks associated with this burgeoning trend, cautioning against assuming that all companies adopting this strategy will exhibit the same resilience as MicroStrategy during market volatility.
